Friday, May 23, 2025
  • العربية
  • Français
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home @NYTimes

Without a Prenup, David Geffen’s Divorce Could Get Interesting

May 22, 2025
in @NYTimes, Business
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Without a Prenup, David Geffen’s Divorce Could Get Interesting
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

New York Times - Business

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/05/22/multimedia/22ST-GEFFEN-DIVORCE-tzkg/22ST-GEFFEN-DIVORCE-tzkg-mediumSquareAt3X-v2.jpg

Related posts

Tax Cuts Now Could Lead to Rising Rates Later. Here’s How to Protect Yourself.

Tax Cuts Now Could Lead to Rising Rates Later. Here’s How to Protect Yourself.

May 23, 2025
Trump Escalates Tariff Threats, Targeting Europe and Apple

Trump Escalates Tariff Threats, Targeting Europe and Apple

May 23, 2025

The billionaire’s marriage to David Armstrong ended with the familiar “irreconcilable differences.” Is Mr. Geffen’s fortune in jeopardy?

David Geffen’s name is affixed to concert halls, medical programs and drama schools. Last week, however, it landed on divorce papers.

Mr. Geffen, 82, was the instigator in a divorce petition filed on Friday in Los Angeles, signaling a split from his husband of two years, David Armstrong, a 32-year-old dancer he married in March 2023.

While the legal grounds were familiar to anyone with a passing knowledge of divorce — “irreconcilable differences,” according to the petition — the circumstances of the dissolution raised some eyebrows because of one detail: The petition also indicates that Mr. Armstrong did not sign a prenuptial agreement with Mr. Geffen, the entertainment mogul whose net worth has been estimated at more than $8 billion.

Whether that will lead to financial distress for Mr. Geffen remains to be seen, say experts in California divorce law. The filing last week shows that Mr. Geffen intends to pay spousal support, which — considering the brevity of the marriage — is generally disbursed over a period equal to about half the length of a marriage.

Still, that support could be sizable considering the luxurious world in which Mr. Geffen — and, until recently, Mr. Armstrong — resided.

Samantha Bley DeJean, a family law attorney in San Francisco, said she would guess that the couple’s lifestyle “was fairly significant,” though she also noted that Mr. Geffen could probably afford whatever the court deemed support to be.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest
guest
0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • العربية
  • Français
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply