Monday, June 16, 2025
  • العربية
  • Français
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home @NYTimes

Johnson & Johnson Loses in Court Again in Bid to Settle Talc Cases

April 1, 2025
in @NYTimes, Business
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Johnson & Johnson Loses in Court Again in Bid to Settle Talc Cases
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

New York Times - Business

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/03/31/multimedia/31biz-talc-lfcg/31biz-talc-lfcg-mediumSquareAt3X.jpg

Related posts

Everyone Is Using A.I. for Everything. Is That Bad?

Everyone Is Using A.I. for Everything. Is That Bad?

June 16, 2025
Equipment Outages Vexed Newark Airport Controllers for Years

Equipment Outages Vexed Newark Airport Controllers for Years

June 16, 2025

A judge dismissed an attempt to use a bankruptcy court to resolve tens of thousands of claims that the company’s talcum power products caused cancer.

A federal bankruptcy judge in Houston on Monday rejected Johnson & Johnson’s request to approve a $9 billion settlement with tens of thousands of people who are suing the company over claims that its talcum powder products caused cancer.

The proposal would have resolved nearly all current and future claims that the company’s talc products contained asbestos and caused cancer. Like the previous two efforts — in 2021 and 2023 — the deal tried to use an element of the bankruptcy system to settle the claims.

Johnson & Johnson claims that its products did not contain asbestos and that there was no proven link between its products and the cancer, the judge, Christopher Lopez, wrote in his ruling. Johnson & Johnson has long denied those claims, but has in recent years stopped selling talc-based baby powder worldwide.

Over 90,000 claims against Johnson & Johnson and other parties are pending, far too many for the courts to process individually.

The settlement attempt by the company and lawyers for the plaintiffs who brought the claims was opposed by a Department of Justice bankruptcy trustee as well as other plaintiffs’ lawyers, the judge said.

In a statement on Monday, Johnson & Johnson said, “The court has unfortunately allowed a couple of law firms with financially conflicted motives, who have conceded they have not recovered a dime for their clients in a decade of litigation, to defeat the overwhelming desire of claimants.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest
guest
0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • العربية
  • Français
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply